|
Business SMART: |
How Many Trade Shows
Are Too Many? |
|
|
By:
Dennis A. Conforto
Chairman & CEO of A-Z Media Group, Inc. |
|

|
One of the great
challenges of any industry is to find the right balance in the
number of trade shows to properly support an industry. Too many
trade shows makes it difficult if not impossible for both
manufacturers and retailers to be profitable. Too few trade
shows and it could hurt the growth and expansion of the entire
industry.
The challenge, therefore, is to understand the right amount of
trade show for an industry to truly be successful. I for one
believe that we have too many trade shows for the scrapbooking
industry and that it’s now starting to have a negative impact on
everyone within the industry.
Recently a fourth trade show has appeared trying to gain roots
for an east coast spring show. Now, I have nothing against the
east coast, but clearly the industry does not need another
buying trip for retailers who are over-buying now and whose
bloated inventories will be their demise.
Manufacturers already offer too much selection and always feel
the need to add new products for each new show. Of course this
contributes to their bloated inventories as well as their
demise.
The more scrapbooking trade shows we create the more we add cost
to manufacturers and retailers alike. More business is not done
by having more trade shows; rather, cost is added to the whole
supply chain process with each new trade show.
Simply stated, there are not enough style or color changes that
are significant enough to have more than two trade shows per
year for the scrapbooking industry. This simply means, for the
good of all, the new trade show that is now trying to work its
way into the industry should not be supported. And, since we
have three trade shows now and we only need two, I believe we
need to see one of those three trade shows go away.
Looking at it objectively, we have two shows that are put on by
the industry association CHA, a non-profit association. Those
shows happen in the winter and summer with the winter out west
and the summer out east. Their timing is perfect and they fit
into the cycle of new product introductions. They are bigger
than just scrapbooking and help support other segments of the
craft industry.
The other industry show is towards the end of summer. This show
is not run by an association but rather by a very successful,
publicly held media giant. The company's focus is profit - it
has a need to satisfy its own stock holders. At times, that very
same publicly held company finds itself at cross purposes within
the industry that its publications serve. Many leading
manufacturers now see this media giant as more of a competitor
than a group of publications for the craft industry.
Since the industry can only afford two trade shows, I am
suggesting that, as an industry, we support the change to ensure
our own success by clearly getting behind the two CHA shows and
fully supporting them and completely withdrawing from the all
other trade shows together. The benefits for doing so are many:
1. Reduce overall trade show marketing cost anywhere from 33% to
50% thereby reducing the cost of the product to the retailer,
part of which is passed on to the consumer.
2. Reduce the number of new product introductions in an industry
over-flooded with new product much of which never becomes a top
industry seller.
3. Strengthen the attendance of the two shows rather than weaken
the attendance of three to four shows.
4. Supporting the association trade shows creates more exposure
for business-related education of the industries it serves.
5. Of course the by-product of all of the above is that it
increases turn rates and cash flow.
A two-trade-show system would, in effect, raise all the boats in
the harbor allowing everyone in their respective areas to
increase their own profitability. The only one to make money on
additional trade shows is the sponsor of the trade show since
they are inventing something that has already been invented. In
the end, all it truly does is add cost to an industry that needs
to learn to live within its means and not simply survive. Only
then will it thrive and flourish to the 15 billion dollar
industry it could and should be. And that is what being business
SMART is all about. |
|